← Search

Tammy Oley

— year-end
28 matches · 20W–8L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Tammy Oley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2021-09-26 · C 5.5W MV Eyre · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Maggie Stefanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2021-09-19 · C 5.5W MV Eyre · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lishan Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2021-02-26 · C 5.5W MV Hunter · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Bridget Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2021-02-19 · C 5.5W MV Hunter · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Karen Bokovitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2020-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Xiaozhong Men
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2020-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Fricke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2020-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janice Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
Lori Reed / Meghan Sabitsch
2019-11-22 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Eileen Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2019-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Eileen Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2019-11-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janeen Miklowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2019-11-03 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dongmei Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Nancy Adams / Nancy Paskevich
2019-11-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janeen Miklowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams3 teams · 2021–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.7% of games
5.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 63.4% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#1 Singles
11%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova