← Search

Natalie Barrett

— year-end
93 matches · 44W–49L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Natalie Barrett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Aylward-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Aylward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-09 · Carro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robyn Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · Eason/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Penny Wood-Wiener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · Carro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caley Spotts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Meg Smith / Terri Smith
2026-08-18 · Eason/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shanna Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · Carro/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cameron Beedle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Carro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caley Spotts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · Eason/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Penny Wood-Wiener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · Aylward-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer LaMastus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Carro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bronia Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Carro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Schnacke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · Carro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Woodmansee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams66 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 63.6% of games
3.5
49.1%
27W–28L · 47.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 37.6% of games
6.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King