← Search

Libby Nabors

— year-end
59 matches · 29W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Libby Nabors to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Gibbs/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amy Smythe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
JoAnn Cooper / Brooke Smith
2026-08-26 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Eckelkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Nabors/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Garner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Owen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · McGuire/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephen Stroud mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-13 · Garnett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Swanquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · McGuire/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Nabors mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Garnett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer London
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Whitney Williams / Jessica McDaniel
2026-05-03 · Nabors/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Mcguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · Hannaman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Garrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-16 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer London
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 55.1% of games
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 39.6% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.8% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 52.2% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer