Glynda Westerbeek
Cary, NC
55 matches · 19W–36L · seasons 2021–2025
Captains: add Glynda Westerbeek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history55 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 0-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
Katherine Fehervari / Kay Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2025
BENT.Corse
BENT.Stratemeier
BENT.Wagner
KF.Collins
KF.Murphy
KF.Scagnelli
KF.Scagnelli
KF.Scagnelli
KF.Collins
KF.Murphy
KF.Scagnelli
KF.Westerbeek
TING.Westerbeek
TOC.Murphy
TOC.Raasch
TOC.Fettig
TOC.Jee
TOC.Murphy
TOC.Murphy
TOHS.Peters
TOHS.Westerbeek
1.TOHS.Peters
1.TOHS.Westerbeek
5.TOHS.Finn
TOC.Fettig
TOHS.Peters
1. APEX.WESTERBEEK
1. TOHS.WESTERBEEK
3. TOHS.DEBOSKEY
3. TOHS.FINN
6. TOHS.MURPHY
6. TOHS.PETERS
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 50.7% of games
3.0
23.8%
5W–16L · 38% of games
5.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.5% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.