← Search

Dana Briggs

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 15W–27L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dana Briggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-05-10 · KF.Scagnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · KF.Scagnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-21 · KF.Scagnelli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · KF.Scagnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Forman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Meredith Kinkle / Kelly Shields
2025-08-30 · TOC.Swank · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-09 · TOC.Swank · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sally Willert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-12 · KF.Scagnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-22 · KF.Scagnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Hellrung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-02-26 · KF.Scagnelli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Glynda Westerbeek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-02-22 · KF.Scagnelli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Glynda Westerbeek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-07 · KF.Collins · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Scagnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-04-03 · KF.Scagnelli · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jocelyn Quick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
5W–5L · 52.2% of games
3.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 45.3% of games
5.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.1% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert