← Search

Katherine Fehervari

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 68W–68L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Katherine Fehervari to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
L
2026-09-09 · ANP.Fehervari · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kelly Pfrommer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · ANP.Fehervari · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cassandra Lagod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-21 · ANP.Laine · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cassandra Lagod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-07 · ANP.Laine · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Paula Laine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Qubeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Qubeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shirley Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-27 · TOC.Burnham · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · ANP.Fehervari · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Coman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-16 · ANP.Fehervari · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Alarcon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-06 · TOC.Burnham · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Qubeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
59.7%
37W–25L · 52.1% of games
3.0
9.1%
2W–20L · 34.5% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 56.7% of games
5.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer