← Search

Katie Hungarter

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 39W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Katie Hungarter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-09-02 · ANP.Fehervari · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Paula Laine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-14 · ANP.Laine · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Courtney Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Hungarter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Hungarter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Hungarter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · NMAC.Baldyga · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rossana Bolla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · ANP.Fehervari · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Lennon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-04-20 · NMAC.Baldyga · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Laine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Jennifer Johnson
2026-04-09 · ANP.Fehervari · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-19 · ANP.Fehervari · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claudia Bourbeau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · NMAC.Baldyga · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Laine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-16 · NMAC.Baldyga · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheri Lieffrig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 52.9% of games
3.0
23.8%
5W–16L · 36.4% of games
5.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.4% of games
5.5
60%
9W–6L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams