← Search

Ping Zhou

— year-end
63 matches · 39W–24L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ping Zhou to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-05-03 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Ybos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · Hurt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amasa Lacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ching Cushing-Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-25 · Hurt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-22 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Northen-Lacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Lacy/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terrie Dietsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ching Cushing-Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-11 · Hurt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · Lacy/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Bechtel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · Hurt/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · Lacy/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Northen-Lacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-22 · Lacy/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
Teams31 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 58.5% of games
3.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 46% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.5% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams