← Search

Whitney Leab

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 59W–39L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Whitney Leab to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-09-01 · TOC.LaPlante · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacqueline Crutcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · TOC.LaPlante · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacqueline Crutcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Jordan Adams / Emily Murphy
2026-08-24 · Me.George18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Southern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-21 · Al.DeMacy40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison DeMacy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · Me.George18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paula Bullock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · Ja.Martin18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-03 · Me.George18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Southern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Me.George18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · Me.George18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaime Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · Me.George18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · Me.George18A4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-13 · Me.George18A4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Kell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 61% of games
3.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 52.3% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.2% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 64.8% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 31.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#1 Singles
18%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
15 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe