← Search

Lee Yates

— year-end
17 matches · 9W–8L · seasons 2024–2025

Captains: add Lee Yates to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
W
2025-08-10 · Adams/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellen Horn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-04-10 · Powell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bailey Salmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-25 · Powell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Williford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-09-26 · Powell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mandy Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-19 · Powell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Leah Williford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-09-12 · Powell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Dunavant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-08-13 · Powell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Leah Williford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Laura Beth Gabriel / Carrie Anderson
2024-05-02 · Powell / Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristy Dorman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
Katie McDermott / Lauren Parks
2024-05-01 · George/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Sossaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-04-24 · George/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenny Gusmus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2024-04-03 · George/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Malaney George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-03-28 · Powell / Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malaney George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams8 teams · 2023–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 66.3% of games
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.6% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.4% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
2 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova