← Search

Sarah Rider

— year-end
103 matches · 88W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Rider to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-06-03 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Elizabeth Kim / Rebecca Perkins
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · with Mikaela Leaman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-23 · #1 Doubles · with Mikaela Leaman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · with Mikaela Leaman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-11-21 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-11-02 · Lanc CC - Betteridge · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-31 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-17 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-10-03 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-07-02 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-06-11 · Lanc CC - Spire · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Betteridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 68.8% of games
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 65.5% of games
4.0
80%
12W–3L · 64.4% of games
7.0
100%
6W–0L · 77.4% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 67.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe