← Search

Mark Reed

— year-end
40 matches · 18W–22L · seasons 2020–2023

Captains: add Mark Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2023-06-11 · HOA/Granger/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-06-04 · HOA/Granger/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nathan Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2023-05-30 · Granger, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2023-05-21 · HOA/Granger/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nathan Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2023-05-09 · Granger, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roy True
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2023-05-07 · HOA/Granger/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy True
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-04-23 · HOA/Granger/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roy True
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-1
L
2023-04-16 · HOA/Granger/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2022-11-19 · Granger, Nathan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Thomasson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2022-10-29 · Granger, Nathan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-10-01 · Granger, Nathan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2022-06-12 · HOA/Granger/Muller/55&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randal Nadolny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams15 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 45.8% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 47.4% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe