← Search

Taylor Bender

— year-end
65 matches · 54W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Taylor Bender to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Bender/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-02 · Bender/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-27 · Bender/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abby Spann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Bender/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Bender/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Emily Brown / Freddy Ojeda
2026-07-25 · Neal/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Brackett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-12 · Neal/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Brackett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · Neal/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peyton Neal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Chelsey Savage / Elizabeth Day
2026-05-06 · Bender/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · Goetsch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-09 · Goetsch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · Bender/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams19 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 70.1% of games
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 65.9% of games
3.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 62.4% of games
4.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 55.8% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.8% of games
7.5
90%
9W–1L · 62.6% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#1 Singles
14%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova