← Search

Maryellen Tabor

— year-end
84 matches · 52W–32L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Maryellen Tabor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Lane/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carolyn Labonia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Corrigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-27 · Martin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ann McKnight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carolyn Labonia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Flesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Missy Euler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-02 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raquel Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raquel Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Elizabeth Day / Lindsey Myers
2026-06-15 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veronica Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-08 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raquel Lane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-15 · Lane/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-08 · Lane/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams33 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 68.7% of games
3.0
76.3%
29W–9L · 61.8% of games
3.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 47.7% of games
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 60.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert