← Search

Katie Klingemann

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 99W–62L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Katie Klingemann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
W
2026-09-14 · MD.Wade · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Messick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-11 · MD.Zies · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jonay Zies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · MD.Wade · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Poore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-28 · MD.Zies · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katie Cork
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-21 · MD.Zies · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Caroline Stallings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · MD.Zies · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melissa Keener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · MD.Wade · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · MD.Wade · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Reinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · MD.Wade · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · MD.Zies · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jonay Zies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · MD.Wade · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · MD.Wade · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Pavlick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 64.4% of games
2.5
64%
16W–9L · 57.7% of games
3.0
60.6%
40W–26L · 54.5% of games
3.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 33.5% of games
5.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.7% of games
5.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 54.3% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
28 matches
#1 Singles
14%
22 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King