← Search

Paula Laine

Apex, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 65W–114L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Paula Laine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history179 matches
W
2026-09-09 · ANP.Fehervari · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Christine Lennon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · ANP.Fehervari · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katie Hungarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-28 · ANP.Laine · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Yuna Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Alarcon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · ANP.Laine · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katherine Fehervari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · BENT.Corse · #2 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Lilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Courtney Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · NMAC.Baldyga · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Lilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · BENT.Corse · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · NMAC.Baldyga · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Jo Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-03 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Courtney Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
34.4%
42W–80L · 42.6% of games
3.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 37% of games
5.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 51% of games
5.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
26 matches
#2 Singles
11%
19 matches
#1 Singles
10%
18 matches
#3 Singles
6%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert