← Search

Hayley Cain

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 22W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Hayley Cain to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Ha.Cain18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-18 · Ju.Kerr18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Martha Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-13 · #3 Doubles · with Taylor Anthony championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · Ju.Kerr18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adrienne Brewer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Capps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Capps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · Ta.Anthony18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Capps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · Sa.Highsmith18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Sibley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chase Felmet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-02 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4
L
2026-07-01 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 26.3% of games
3.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 60.4% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova