← Search

Cynthia Workman

Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 56W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cynthia Workman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-06-15 · Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Spomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Spomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · NE/WC/Margaret Scofield/65 and over 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Scofield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Scofield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Spomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-19 · NE/WC/Margaret Scofield/65 and over 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Bigando
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcia Holbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · NE/WC/Margaret Scofield/65 and over 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-08 · Martin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-25 · Martin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-02-02 · Holbrook · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tory Jorgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
Nancy Johnson / Erik Johnson
2025-01-24 · Blumel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
26.1%
12W–34L · 38.2% of games
7.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 59.4% of games
8.0
55%
11W–9L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#1 Singles
10%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer