← Search

Chase Felmet

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 44W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Chase Felmet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
Stephanie Simpson / Kelly Day
2026-08-31 · Ha.Cain18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Blake Fricks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · Sa.Highsmith18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Felmet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-15 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-08 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Ta.Anthony18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Boney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Ta.Anthony18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-02 · Ta.Anthony18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-28 · Sa.Highsmith18A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · TOC.Schuch · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Cain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Sa.Highsmith18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-17 · TOC.Schuch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Cronin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-14 · Sa.Highsmith18A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
72%
18W–7L · 61.5% of games
3.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 54.3% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 49.7% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer