← Search

Blake Fricks

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 13W–9L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Blake Fricks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
Stephanie Simpson / Kelly Day
2026-08-31 · Ha.Cain18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chase Felmet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · Ha.Cain18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Capps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-19 · Cl.Duff18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Piper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-10-02 · Cl.Duff40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-11 · Cl.Duff40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-04 · Ma.Harris18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Goodmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-04-30 · Lo.Henry40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Austin Coley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-04-16 · Ma.Harris18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Goodmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-04-16 · Ma.Harris18A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Goodmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-29 · Ma.Harris18A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chase Felmet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
Anne Axberg / Yvette DeSilva
2025-03-25 · Lo.Henry40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-03-09 · Ma.Harris18A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Goodmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 59.6% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 42.9% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#1 Singles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert