← Search

Jill Ladd

Alma, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 4W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jill Ladd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
L
2026-06-30 · Harp/FS/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deana Deramo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-11 · Parker/FS/BG · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenna Gilliam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-07 · Parker/FS/BG · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deana Deramo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-05 · Parker/FS/BG · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-04 · Parker/FS/BG · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · Parker/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matheson Ladd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
Amanda Daniels / Caroline Smith
2026-04-15 · Parker/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matheson Ladd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · Parker/FS/BG · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deana Deramo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-12-16 · Parker/FS/CM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matheson Ladd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-11-13 · Parker/FS/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deana Deramo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-11-11 · Parker/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deana Deramo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0%
0W–11L · 27% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova