← Search

Sara Hyde

Apex, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 55W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sara Hyde to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-09-11 · ANP.Alex · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Baldyga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-10 · ACP.Baldyga · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-03 · ACP.Baldyga · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kace Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · ACP.Baldyga · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Baldyga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · ACP.Baldyga · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marni Butchkoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · ANP.Alex · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-20 · ACP.Baldyga · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danelle Alex
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-08-17 · ACP.Baldyga · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Malinda Hain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
Denise Wilson / Angki Sager
2026-06-30 · NMAC.Baldyga · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Baldyga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-23 · NMAC.Baldyga · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kace Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christa Resavy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
15W–0L · 88.7% of games
3.5
40%
8W–12L · 46.2% of games
5.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.6% of games
5.5
100%
9W–0L · 74.8% of games
6.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 48.6% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
48 matches
#1 Singles
19%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer