← Search

Tyler Welch

— year-end
50 matches · 39W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tyler Welch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2025-11-17 · Life Time - Haladwala · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Faircloth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-11-06 · Life Time - Casey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hammond Reynolds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-04 · BHRC - Porter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Drew Beckwith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-03 · Life Time - Haladwala · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Faircloth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-28 · BHRC - Porter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Stout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-27 · Life Time - Haladwala · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Faircloth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-20 · Life Time - Haladwala · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Faircloth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-14 · BHRC - Porter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Stout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-07 · BHRC - Porter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clay Stout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-06 · Life Time - Haladwala · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Harbison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-30 · BHRC - Porter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-29 · Life Time - Haladwala · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Casey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams23 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
80.6%
29W–7L · 64.1% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 60.8% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer