← Search

Holly Watson

Kansas City, MO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 11W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Holly Watson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-05-08 · True, Jane · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Petra Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-01 · True, Jane · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela ODonnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-12-14 · True, Jane · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-11-02 · True, Jane · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane True
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-26 · True, Jane · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-19 · True, Jane · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Ayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-14 · True, Jane · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-30 · True, Jane · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Churchman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-11-24 · Kowalczyk, Rebecca · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-11-10 · Kowalczyk, Rebecca · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Nulan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-03 · Kowalczyk, Rebecca · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Ayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-10-13 · Kowalczyk, Rebecca · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Walzl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
31.2%
10W–22L · 44.5% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer