← Search

Denise Johnson

Omaha, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 76W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Denise Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
L
2026-06-18 · Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Fuxa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammie Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-02 · Jennings · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheryl Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · Holbrook · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terri Fuxa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · Holbrook · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammie Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-13 · Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheryl Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Jennings · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheryl Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-06 · Jorgensen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Foral
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Martin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Workman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-25 · Martin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Workman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-18 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terri Fuxa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-01-11 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 38.9% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
48.6%
36W–38L · 50% of games
7.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 60.9% of games
8.0
40.9%
18W–26L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 31.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King