← Search

Patricia Demers

Estes Park, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 100W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patricia Demers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
L
2026-08-16 · MC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anthony Duhon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-2
W
2026-08-02 · MC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anthony Duhon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Catalano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-4
L
2026-07-21 · MC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Salzberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · MC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neil Demers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-12 · MC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neil Demers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Catalano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · MC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christian Hogrefe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · MC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Salzberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-2, 0-0
W
2026-06-25 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Boisnard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Mazzarese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · MC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Catalano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
58.7%
37W–26L · 52.1% of games
4.0
34.6%
9W–17L · 46% of games
7.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 57.8% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 49% of games
6.5mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
34.1%
14W–27L · 44.4% of games
7.5mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.1% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
54 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer