← Search

MIchelle Aurzada

Commerce City, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 82W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add MIchelle Aurzada to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-09-03 · NJ PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Stapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Lauren Anderson / Molly Nelson
2026-08-06 · NJ PINK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holland Asbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · NJ PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Stapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Lenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Lenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · NJ GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Stapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Hock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
April Kobayashi / Jennifer Rogers
2026-06-04 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Lenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
Hilary Murphy / Lauren Anderson
2026-04-23 · NJ TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-16 · NJ TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Stapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2025-08-21 · NJ PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Stapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-31 · NJ PINK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Stapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 60.5% of games
3.5
63.1%
41W–24L · 57.5% of games
6.5mixed
75%
9W–3L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
12W–15L · 49.3% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova