N Maxine Kennebrew
118 matches · 50W–68L · seasons 2019–2025
Captains: add N Maxine Kennebrew to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history118 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jennifer Deisinger / Kathy Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Teams27 teams · 2021–2025
2EAST-MONTE win tri 45 40 35 W SEM F2
3FAC-BLUMBERG 4.5+ women win singles SEM
4EAST-MONTE 45NW WE 18&O SEM
4EAST-MONTE WOMEN HIGH 50 45 40 TRI SEM
3EAST-KEAN 9.0 MIXED 40&O SEM
3EAST-MONTE 18&O WED 45 NW SEM
3EAST-MONTE JAN TRI-LEVEL 45 40 35 Women SEM
4EAST-MONTE 18&O AUG TRI 50,45,40 WOMEN SEM
5EAST-MONTE 85WOMEN SEM
FAC-BLUMBERG Winter Team Singles 4.5+ WOMEN SEM F
2EAST-MONTE 8.5W COMBO SEM F2
2EAST-MONTE AD18&O 45NW WED SEM
3EAST-MONTE SEM Tri-Level Showdown W 95 85 75
3EAST-MONTE TRI-LEVEL W AUG 454035 SEM F2
1EAST-MONTE 85 W/E WOMEN SEM F2
2EAST-KEAN 8.0 mix 40&O SEM f2
3EAST-MONTE women tri-level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 SEM F2
3PEACH-PARROTT 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F3
FAC-STEINER D1 WE W tri-level showdown SEM
1FAC-ECKERT 45NW 18&O AD WED SEM
3EAST-KEAN 8.0 40&O Mixed SEM F2
3EAST-MONTE 85 WW COMBO SEM F1
3PEACH-DEGUZMAN 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F3
4BLOOM-CROUSON 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F3
5WIM-MAHER 40NW 40&O AD THURS SEM F3
6PEACH-PARROTT W tri-level 35 40 45 SEM
MI SEM OHCC-KERANEN 45NW 40&O AD MON SEM
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 46.5% of games
4.5
32.4%
11W–23L · 41.9% of games
9.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 44.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#1 Singles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.