← Search

Jade Moore

Odenton, MD
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 95W–75L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jade Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-07-28 · YMYM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Walls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · YMYM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · YMYM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Motley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · YMYM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Motley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · Lady Tigers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sylvia Okala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · Lady Tigers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sylvia Okala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-1
W
N/A
2026-06-25 · YMYM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamara Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · Martin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · Lady Tigers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with SanYvette Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · YMYM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simone Saunches
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · Lady Tigers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · YMYM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Walls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
82.1%
23W–5L · 64.1% of games
3.5
47.7%
31W–34L · 51.1% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 54.5% of games
8.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 30.5% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer