← Search

Wendi Mihalko

— year-end
86 matches · 41W–45L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Wendi Mihalko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Washburn/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with E'Lane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Walton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Melinda Hoehn / Cindy Miller
2026-08-13 · Washburn/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with E'Lane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-04 · Walton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Meagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Savage/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Savage/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsey Savage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Eason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Kuhlo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · Musick/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Kuhlo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Day / Rebekah Kingsley
2026-06-08 · Savage/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth McKnight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-04 · Musick/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Trotz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams64 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
49%
25W–26L · 51.6% of games
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 47.1% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.4% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
19 matches
#1 Singles
14%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova