← Search

Renee Getz

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 29W–100L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Renee Getz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-09-08 · PW.Stylski · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Coe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · PW.Stylski · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margo Stutesman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-04-16 · PW.Stylski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carole Bobby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-19 · PW.Stylski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Micha Federico
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-22 · PW.McGowan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah van Saun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-15 · PW.McGowan · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Comer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Maria Button / Sally Grogan
2025-08-25 · PW.Stutesman · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joan del Giorno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-04 · PW.McGowan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Kupfrian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-09 · ACP.Sinopoli · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Paye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-19 · ACP.Sinopoli · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carole Bobby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-17 · PW.Stylski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda MacLean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-10 · PW.Stylski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Lawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
25%
9W–27L · 37.1% of games
4.0
8.9%
4W–41L · 30% of games
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 26.4% of games
7.5
36.1%
13W–23L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova