← Search

Hady Abi-Aad

Apex, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 30W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hady Abi-Aad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-08-25 · To.Larrichio55C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-19 · TOC.Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · TOC.Adams · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dirk German
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-08 · KF.Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-02 · KF.Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-09-21 · KF.Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Srinath Ekkad / David Chiu
2025-09-09 · KF.Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Craig Cardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-08-24 · KF.Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Craig Cardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-19 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bala Ramadoss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-28 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Craig Cardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Patrick Shields / Richard McClenny
2025-06-07 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Craig Cardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-31 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Bruner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
22.9%
11W–37L · 40.8% of games
8.5
31.4%
16W–35L · 44.9% of games
9.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams