← Search

Erin Harp

— year-end
32 matches · 16W–16L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Erin Harp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2021-09-28 · Zahn/LF · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Sumners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2021-09-14 · Zahn/LF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Sumners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2021-08-18 · McCorkle/LF · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gloria Mullenix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2021-08-09 · McCorkle/LF · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tina Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2021-07-27 · McCorkle/LF · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tina Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2021-07-08 · McCorkle/LF · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tina Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2020-07-20 · Zahn/LF · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Sumners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2020-06-29 · Zahn/LF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Sumners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2020-06-08 · Zahn/LF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Sumners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2020-06-02 · Zahn/LF · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Kolman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2019-08-12 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Moody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2019-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Rost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams3 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
5W–5L · 51.6% of games
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 52% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert