← Search

Jode Ritsema

Cary, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 78W–15L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jode Ritsema to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · with Blair Risinger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · TOC.Winzenz · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-15 · TOC.Ahlquist · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Shoffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-14 · TOC.Winzenz · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blair Risinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-09 · TOC.Ostrander · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · TOC.Winzenz · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blair Risinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-04-06 · TOC.Ahlquist · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shelly Kirkpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-04 · TOC.Ahlquist · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Ahlquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · TOC.Ostrander · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Allison Ostrander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-17 · TOC.Winzenz · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Shoffner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-11 · TOC.Ahlquist · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tanya Parise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-10 · TOC.Winzenz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Zadell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
85.7%
42W–7L · 66.7% of games
5.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
8.5
100%
7W–0L · 64.8% of games
9.0
100%
8W–0L · 69.3% of games
9.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer