← Search

Jane Strawhecker

Kearney, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 70W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Strawhecker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Adams Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · NEWC/LubbenTegler/18&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Heim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · NEWC/LubbenTegler/18&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neeley Remmers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · Strawhecker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Blumel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-14 · Strawhecker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-02-08 · Pope · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheema Budler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · Stoupa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephan Andersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-01 · Pope · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheema Budler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-01-18 · Pope · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-09 · Stoupa · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephan Andersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-19 · Strawhecker/ReQua · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephan Andersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-03 · Strawhecker/ReQua · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephan Andersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.4% of games
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 63% of games
4.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 54.9% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
89.5%
17W–2L · 69.4% of games
8.0mixed
77.1%
27W–8L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer