← Search

Shellyn Sands

— year-end
131 matches · 55W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shellyn Sands to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Van Ostrand · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Dirksen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-4
L
2026-08-11 · Van Ostrand · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jodi Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · Gallagher/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Myong Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Gallagher/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Myong Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · Gallagher/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Hohlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-22 · Van Ostrand · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Tyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-11 · Van Ostrand · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Wilkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-06 · Sands · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Ek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-08-02 · Lubben · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Samuel Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
Nancy Johnson / Kara Heim
2025-06-10 · Gallagher · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-06-07 · Lubben · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ty Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-05-20 · Gallagher · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deb Boehle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
40%
4W–6L · 46.9% of games
3.0
38.9%
14W–22L · 45.7% of games
3.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 51.2% of games
4.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 47.1% of games
6.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 44.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer