← Search

Jennifer Rambin

Columbus, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 107W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Rambin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
2026-03-29 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-22 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L
Michelle Miller / Jennifer Murphy
2026-03-08 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Talbot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-01 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-2
L
2026-02-01 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-06-26 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara Wiese
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-12 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Bell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-29 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Bell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-05-04 · Olympic 1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-27 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Houck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-13 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hallie Sisko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-04-06 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Pliskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
65.2%
90W–48L · 56.7% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.7% of games
7.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
51 matches
#1 Singles
15%
24 matches
#2 Singles
10%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert