← Search

Mambwe Deen

Bloomfield Hills, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 88W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mambwe Deen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-07-13 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Wachowicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · DEER-Mengyan 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Wachowicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laurie Blume
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · DEER-Mengyan 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ty Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-24 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ty Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-11-22 · 2DEER- Deisinger 85 WOMEN COMBO · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Foust
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-18 · 2DEER- Deisinger 85 WOMEN COMBO · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Holly Machus
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-06-11 · 3DEER-MALYS 45NW WE 18&O SEM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ty Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-02 · 2BT-DEEN 45NW MO 40&O SEM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ty Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-05-19 · 2BT-DEEN 45NW MO 40&O SEM · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ty Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-05-14 · 3DEER-MALYS 45NW WE 18&O SEM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Stearns-Pfeiffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-08 · 3DEER-MENGYAN win tri 45 40 35 W SEM1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jori Lewis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
84.6%
33W–6L · 65.6% of games
4.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 51.6% of games
7.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 66.4% of games
8.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.5% of games
9.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer