← Search

Natalie Royal

— year-end
67 matches · 21W–46L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Natalie Royal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Siler/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melinda Hoehn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-27 · Siler/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jorianne Siskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · Siler/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jorianne Siskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · Belvin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Stolnicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-25 · Scifert/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-13 · Simonetti/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Rieves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-05 · Belvin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Paige
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-04 · Scifert/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Polly Cotten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-28 · Siler/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-13 · Siler/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-30 · Scifert/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karin Rubnitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-04-24 · Belvin/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie McCreary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
42.1%
16W–22L · 48.1% of games
4.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 29.4% of games
6.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.5% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 34% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova