← Search

Vicki Sue Loehrs

— year-end
175 matches · 98W–77L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Vicki Sue Loehrs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Fitzgerald/LF/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · Elias/LF/Day3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5
W
2026-08-11 · Grimes/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Buechler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Grimes/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Hubbard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-13 · Grimes/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Buechler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · Celestain/LF/3.5W · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-16 · Willis/LF 55s 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · Celestain/LF/3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Willis/LF 55s 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-04 · Celestain/LF/3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-02 · Willis/LF 55s 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · Sides/FR 40s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Grant Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
Teams46 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
44.8%
13W–16L · 47.9% of games
3.0
65.7%
46W–24L · 56.1% of games
3.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 48.3% of games
6.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 66.5% of games
7.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.7% of games
5.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
21 matches
#1 Singles
10%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe