← Search

Trish Houck

— year-end
38 matches · 17W–21L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Trish Houck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-05-17 · Martin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-13 · Martin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-25 · Ahmed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Everline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-02 · Ahmed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosalie Hooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-12 · Ahmed · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Corbiere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-08-08 · Team Patti · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rosalie Hooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Jennifer Arthur / Trish Fulcher
2023-07-20 · Team Curtis · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sabra Szczyglowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2023-07-09 · Charle's Angles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tia Briscoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-07-06 · Team Curtis · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with REGINA DAVIS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-06-30 · Team Curtis · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with REGINA DAVIS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
Kimberly Walker / Katina Linkins
2023-06-25 · Charle's Angles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Louden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Kimberly Walker / Nikki Rawls
2023-06-24 · Charle's Angles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with REGINA DAVIS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 54.6% of games
3.5
40%
8W–12L · 49% of games
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 38.6% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams