← Search

Claire Rossmark

Millersville, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
318 matches · 150W–168L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Claire Rossmark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history318 matches
L
2026-07-23 · Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dale Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Laabs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with June Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Slice Girls Divas 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · Slice Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Walko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-13 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with June Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-09 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with June Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · Slice Girls Divas 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Birnkammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-07 · Slice Girls Divas 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leann Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · Slice Girls Divas 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Slice Girls Divas 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
20%
2W–8L · 42.5% of games
3.5
54.2%
78W–66L · 53% of games
4.0
20.8%
10W–38L · 39.7% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 59.7% of games
7.5
52%
13W–12L · 53.7% of games
8.0
35%
7W–13L · 46% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
9W–15L · 49.4% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
64 matches
#1 Singles
10%
32 matches
#2 Singles
9%
27 matches
#3 Singles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer