← Search

Sarah Spinosa

— year-end
31 matches · 15W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sarah Spinosa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-04-21 · Walton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Ezzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · Walton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Ezzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-23 · Walton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Glassell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-11-20 · Walton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Ezzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-16 · Walton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Beard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
Mary Durham / Karen Franklin
2025-10-01 · Walton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Ezzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-26 · Ramsey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-19 · Buziak/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Canale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-03-29 · Buziak/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kassen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-11-13 · Savage/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with FELICIA HAUSER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2024-11-02 · Buziak/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennings Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
Micaela Cignetti / Stephanie Bailey
2024-10-31 · Savage/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Kamm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.4% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.1% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer