← Search

D'Anne Wagner

Brick, NJ
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 79W–51L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add D'Anne Wagner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
W
2024-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Penn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2024-06-24 · Risk 4 Rewards · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brigette Elaina Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-4
L
2024-06-10 · Risk 4 Rewards · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann de Waele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-5, 0-1
L
2024-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Kimick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-05-21 · All Balled Up · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Boczon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-05-20 · Risk 4 Rewards · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann de Waele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-04-26 · GAME ON · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marva Matthews-Durden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-23 · All Balled Up · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meaghan Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-04-20 · GAME ON · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Ruben
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-16 · GAME ON · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Ruben
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-02-25 · Team Abou · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jack Abou mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70%
21W–9L · 57% of games
4.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 45.2% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 64.4% of games
8.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer