← Search

Ester Hoogstaden

Pittsburgh, PA
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
53 matches · 29W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ester Hoogstaden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-01-31 · PTA · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 2-3
L
2025-10-05 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eleni Dedousis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
Lawrence Peterson / Esther Kang
2025-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steven Haught mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Seth Wilmore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-11-20 · South HIlls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Heather Gallagher / Anna Volkova
2022-11-13 · South HIlls · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Cathy Chi / Jane Moose
2021-12-05 · Oxford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janelle Kotyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2021-11-20 · Oxford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janelle Kotyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2021-11-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Woods mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
Jane Moose / Cathy Chi
2021-11-06 · Oxford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janelle Kotyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Ryan Farrell / Nidhi Pulicherla
2021-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 2-4
W
2021-10-03 · Oxford · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Linda van Roosmalen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 55.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 65.5% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.2% of games
8.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 55.9% of games
9.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert