← Search

LuAnn Eyerman

APEX, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 132W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add LuAnn Eyerman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history244 matches
L
2026-08-16 · TOC.Leahy · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frank Bologa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
Kevin Eaton / Amanda Miller
2026-07-05 · TOC.Leahy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Johnny Blevins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-21 · TOC.Leahy · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Dobson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
Amanda Miller / NEALE STUTT
2026-05-31 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Duane Donders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · TOC.Leahy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Ehland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-22 · TOC.Leahy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-21 · TOC.Lyon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Berrios-Smothers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-19 · TOC.Leahy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Revels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-14 · TOC.Lyon · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Berrios-Smothers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · TOC.Lyon · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Berrios-Smothers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
57.9%
55W–40L · 54.4% of games
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 43.8% of games
5.5
56%
14W–11L · 55.1% of games
6.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 54.6% of games
6.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
64 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova