← Search

Alexia Grefe

Omaha, NE
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 21W–11L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Alexia Grefe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2025-06-24 · Heard/Blumel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Torrey McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-10 · Heard/Blumel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Flood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-09-27 · NE/Allison/Tri Level3.5-4.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mallory Pole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2023-09-06 · NE/Allison/Tri Level3.5-4.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mallory Pole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-06-20 · Johnson · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Jo Lehan / Denise Johnson
2023-05-30 · Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Blumel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-07-05 · Johnson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-0
W
2022-06-28 · Johnson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-06-14 · Johnson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2022-05-03 · Johnson · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-09-22 · We Tri Harder · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Blumel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2021-08-18 · We Tri Harder · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Blumel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
60%
12W–8L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#1 Singles
13%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal