← Search

Sheryl Vaughn

— year-end
49 matches · 25W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sheryl Vaughn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-06-09 · Jennings · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Polly ReQua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · NE/WC/Margaret Scofield/65 and over 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Vinton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-02 · Jennings · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · Jorgensen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tory Jorgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-13 · Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Denise Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Jennings · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-11 · Johnson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Autera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-04 · Johnson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Autera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-15 · NE/Johnson/65&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia Workman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-09-13 · Swanson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Spurgeon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-09-06 · Swanson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Spurgeon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-08-23 · Swanson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 55.2% of games
4.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.8% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 44.2% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 54.4% of games
8.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.6% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova