← Search

Michaela Brannock

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 91W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michaela Brannock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-09-01 · TOC.Siege · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maya Ress
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · TOC.Siege · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Barclay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · TOC.Armstrong · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-04 · TOC.Siege · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-21 · PW.Eichenseer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tonia Laflamme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shayna Bolton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · PW.Eichenseer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Eichenseer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-06 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · PW.Eichenseer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-17 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-15 · PW.Eichenseer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shayna Bolton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
90%
9W–1L · 71.8% of games
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 76.8% of games
3.0
88%
22W–3L · 67.4% of games
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 61.1% of games
4.0
60%
15W–10L · 52.5% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.2% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
35 matches
#2 Singles
21%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert