← Search

Elizabeth LaBelle

Arvada, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 30W–50L · seasons 2021–2025

Captains: add Elizabeth LaBelle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2025-09-04 · NJ GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Yasbin Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-09-01 · NJ GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-07-30 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-28 · NJ GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Yasbin Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-23 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-30 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deena Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-25 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Yasbin Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-23 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Yasbin Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-16 · NJ PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Yasbin Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-06-04 · NJ GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Yasbin Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-30 · NJ PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yun Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-05-28 · NJ GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Atchley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
58.3%
21W–15L · 51.9% of games
3.0
22%
9W–32L · 38.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#1 Singles
10%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe